[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: editing markup
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jorge Godoy [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 4:52 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Cc: Gregory Leblanc; Ldp Docbook List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: editing markup
> >>>>> "Cees" == Cees de Groot <email@example.com> writes:
> Cees> If the idea is that the author knows what you edited, it's
> Cees> probably most useful to use conditional sections.
> Cees> <!DOCTYPE .... [ ENTITY % Gregs.edits "INCLUDE" ENTITY %
> Cees> Gregs.comments "IGNORE"]> ...
> Cees> <![ %Gregs.comments; [ <para> This piece above totally sux
> Cees> </para> ]]>
> Cees> ...
> Cees> <![ %Gregs.edits; [ <para> Some new text the author
> Cees> forgot......</para> ]]>
> Cees> You get the idea. Disclaimer: check the exact syntax ;-) --
> What's wrong with DocBook markup for revision? I've been using it for
> a while now... They provide in-document (inside it) view of what each
> person has done.
The tag is called <comment> in DocBook3, and <remark> in DocBook 4. Seems
to be a cleaner solution than the above for doing comments. The edits are
handled by CVS.
> CVS does the rest of the job for us...
And it does a bloody good job! :-) Thanks,
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com