[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I don't use the ldp.dsl. I use straight what comes with Redhat 6.2 plus
the 1.54 of walsh.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Greg Ferguson wrote:
>On Aug 10, 1:26pm, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
>> Subject: RE: updates
>> Hmm, how did you process that Poet? It doesn't look like any
>> of the stuff from ldp.dsl is in there. My first guess would
>> be that we fouled something up with the 2-level TOC, but I
>> haven't checked yet.
>It's worked just fine in the past. I'm going to get a copy of
>whatever Poet used to process his instance and take a look.
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
- Re: updates
- From: "Greg Ferguson" <email@example.com>