[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'Reilly Open Source Convention]]
Sebastian Rahtz <email@example.com> writes:
> i really cannot see why you want to stick with SGML and DSSSL.
Both are standards defined by ISO. A big plus. I don't mind XML, after
all it's SGML.
> why not put the effort into XSL FO?
It's joung, isn't it? And XSL code doesn't look appealing -- I like
Lisp languages much more than baroque inventitions like XSL. But "de
work : firstname.lastname@example.org | ------ ,__o
: http://www.suse.de/~ke/ | ------ _-\_<,
home : email@example.com | ------ (*)/'(*)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com