[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simplified DocBook
This is the first time I have read an email from Gary P that has not made
me want to buy a gun and walk into the Post Office (hope I don't offend).
The below I have looked into before and is excellent. It gives a
"gentle" DocBook that people can use and then extend as their
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Gary Preckshot wrote:
<CITE>Apropos another thread that's about the rigors of adopting
<CITE>DocBook, Norman Walsh has published a "simplified subset."
<CITE>This is legal DocBook but doesn't have so many tags. See
<CITE>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
<CITE>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org