[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Proposed LWN submission
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stein Gjoen [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 8:59 AM
> To: Gregory Leblanc
> Cc: Ldp-Discuss (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Proposed LWN submission
> > > > > and posting to <a href="news:comp.os.linux.announce">cola</a>.
> > > >
> > > > I've been wondering what cola is!
> > >
> > > Interesting, in that case we cannot assume everyone else does
> > > so I will suggest it be spelled out in full.
> > The problem with cola is that it's pretty darn ambiguous.
> > Comp.os.linux.announce, comp.os.linux.answers, there's
> probably another that
> > I'm forgetting. Those two are both talked about here, and
> cola doesn't tell
> > you which one...
> Since .answer has been used only for the Linux Journal FAQ the
Why? Well, nevermind now that I've read the announcement...
> cola acronym refers to comp.os.linux.announce but the ambiguity
> should be avoided and is fixed on the earlier posted alternative
> It looks good enough to me and unless someone objects I suggest
> we mail it off to LWN as soon as we can agree on the announcement.
It still reads semiregular...
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com