[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [oswg-dis] Re: reader comments & reviews
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Deb Richardson wrote:
> As I said in my followup, I didn't mean for my message to sound so
> harsh. I'm not at all interested in furthering the "turf-war". You
> must understand that much of my attitude comes from past experiences in
> attempting to work with the LDP, during which all my offers to help were
> turned down or simply ignored. I should not let those past experiences
> colour my attitude at this point, however, and I do apologize.
We are doing our best since august ; we are not responsible from the
> licensing policy is in error. I was under the impression that docs were
> to be released under the "Linux Documentation Project License"
> (http://www.linuxdoc.org/COPYRIGHT.html) or the "LDP Boilerplate
> License". Is there anywhere where the LDP licensing policy is discussed
> on the LDP website? Thanks.
There is a license guide, linux-related documents that don't follow it
(for ex. forbiding commercial redistribution) will not be included.
Guylhem P. Aznar http://www.linuxdoc.org
guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu http://metalab.unc.edu/guylhem
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ----- Benjamin Franklin
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org