[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ODE - requirement for Editors
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Martin Wheeler wrote:
> Obviously, if the writer were able to mark up text appropriately, this would
> be a bonus; but I feel we should make provision for coping with cases where
> this is either not the case, or where legacy texts require translation.
> A single editor could probably quite easily cope with marking up and
> maintaining a number of different documents.
I think it's better for the author/maintainer to maintain the document
taking corrections from the editor than the other way around. This allows
for the fastest content correction. In cases where the author can't or
won't do the appropriate markup the editor could become the
maintainer. This opens lots of those license issues as well :(.
> Thoughts, anyone?
# +++++++++++=================================+++++++++++ #
# der.hans@LuftHans.com #
# http://home.pages.de/~lufthans/ #
# I'm not anti-social, I'm pro-individual. - der.hans #
# ===========+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=========== #
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com